NATIONAL CENTER ON EDUCATIONAL OUTCOMES State Policies on
Participation & Accommodation

Participation & Accommodation Reports Getting Started,
Participation & Accommodation Report Designer,
Participation & Accommodation Summary Reports,
Participation & Accommodation State Profiles,
Participation & Accommodation Prepared Reports
Annual Performance
Reports
(APR)
Reports Getting Started (APR),
Report Designer (APR),
State Profiles (APR)

Other

Publications,
Glossary of Terms,
Data Viewer Tutorial,
Contact Information
NCEO Home | Data Viewer Home

1997 Report Process Used to Review State Policies

State Assessment Policies on Participation and Accommodations for Students with Disabilities: 1997 Update Link to PDF report available online:
http://www.education.umn.edu/NCEO/OnlinePubs/Synthesis29.html

Process Used to Review State Policies:

To update the NCEO files on state participation and accommodations policies, we first made a decision about the conditions under which we would call for more recent information. If we had a policy document with a date more recent than 1995, or if the state did not have a statewide assessment, we did not attempt to update our files. Forty states in all were contacted.

Upon completion of our analysis, all 50 states were provided with copies of summary tables for feedback (including previous information for states that we did not update). We accepted new documents through mid-March, 1997. In total, we updated 34 policies on participation and 32 policies on accommodations. A complete list of the policy documents is in the appendix.

In 1995, the text of all relevant state policies was included in the updates, with highlights presented prior to the actual policies. In this report, we have created tables that summarize the policies. In Table 1, we provide the definitions that we used when deciding whether a state's policy included language referring to a specific category in the tables.

Presenting policy information in tables makes the information easier to use, but sometimes obscures the complexity that underlies the policies. For example, the length and detail of the original source documents, which ranged from one sentence to 40 pages, is not apparent. Another difference is the specificity of the documents to the tests given. Some states, such as Georgia, provide accommodations guidelines, but do not make them specific to the different tests given in the state.

After summarizing in table format the documents received from states, we sent a summary table for states to approve. States could indicate that there were no changes needed, ask for more information in order to decide whether the tables were accurate, or change the tables. If states indicated the need for a change after reviewing the summary table, we requested documentation before making changes.

The information collected is summarized in two sets of tables in this report-one set for participation policies and a second for accommodation policies. Reporting policies, which were addressed previously by Thurlow et al. (1995b) are not included here. Instead a separate analysis of state accountability reports has been conducted by NCEO (Thurlow, Langenfeld, Nelson, Shin, & Coleman, 1997).



Nov-19-2008
U of M © 2008 by the Regents of the University of Minnesota.
The University of Minnesota is an equal opportunity educator and employer.
Privacy Statement |  Accessibility Statement

This Web site is produced by the National Center on Educational Outcomes through a Cooperative Agreement (#H326G050007) with the Research to Practice Division, Office of Special Education Programs, U.S. Department of Education. Opinions expressed in this Web site do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S. Department of Education or Offices within it.